There are essentially two types of relative clauses: non-restrictive and restrictive. Today’s lesson will focus on non-restrictive relative clauses. A relative clause connects related information to a subject, object or possessor in the main clause of the sentence.
INFORMATION 1: Amanda is a teacher.
INFORMATION 2: Amanda has a nice smile.
Connected: Amanda, who has a nice smile, is a teacher.
Let's brainstorm.
Look at the resultant connected sentence.
(1) What is the MAIN clause in the sentence?
(2) Why is that clause the main clause?
(3) Why is the RELATIVE clause set apart by commas?
(4) Why is the relative clause non-restrictive?
Consider this.
1. Amanda is a teacher (and by the way, she has a nice smile).
2. That Amanda has a nice smile is parenthetical or extra information.
▌ More examples:
Example 1: Ivanka (who happens to be rich) has a fake smile.
Example 2: Megumi, who is not so rich, has a much better smile.
Let's make some logical conclusions here.
In Example 1 the information in parentheses is not necessary.
Similarly, in Example 2 the information between the commas is not necessary.
Now, let's practice. For each pair of sentences that follow select the one that you feel is the most important. There is no incorrect answer! It's up to you which piece of information is important.
Note: With non-restrictive relative clauses the identity of the subject (object, or possessor) has already been established. That is, both the speaker and the listener already know the identity.
In each of the relative clauses below, notice that the information
that is given is ADDITIONAL, not necessary information.
Subjects
Jeff, who is an American, loves Japanese food.
Japanese noodle soup, which is served hot, should be slurped.
Objects
I spoke to Jeff, (who) whom we all knew, about his diet.
I tried not to slurp my ramen soup, which was quite hot, but it was impossible.
Possessors
Jeff, whose knowledge of Japanese food is good, gave me some advice.
Jay, whose favorite NBA player is Russell Westbrook, says that he can beat Len in basketball.
Practice
Conjoin each of the following pairs of sentences into one sentence
with a non-restrictive relative clause. Keep in mind that the
information in the relative clause is to be considered additional, that is,
not the main part of the sentence.
1. Leonardo DiCaprio is a famous actor. Leonardo is Len’s cousin.
2. Captain Yossarian is a pilot. Captain Yossarian wants us
to believe that he is crazy.
3. UCLA is the second largest university in California.
UCLA is in Los Angeles.
4. My parents used to live in Orange County. My parents
live in San Diego now.
5. Ksenia is the tallest student in class. Ksenia speaks English well.
6. Angelina Jolie is coming to Nikita’s party tomorrow. I just
called Angelina Jolie.
7. Megumi‘s photo of Jay was stolen. Megumi is unhappy.
8. I saw Nina dancing last night on Hawthorne Boulevard.
Nina is my classmate.
9. Huyen is very happy. Huyen stole Megumi’s photo of Jay.
10. Sayuri was talking to Megumi. Megumi is my classmate.
Unlike a non-restrictive relative clause, a restrictive
relative clause provides information that is NECESSARY to IDENTIFY
the subject (or object, possessor) of the main clause. Compare the
following sentences.
Contains a non-restrictive relative clause
Chita, who likes bananas, is sitting next to Tarzan.
Contains a restrictive relative clause
The man who is eating a bunch of bananas is Nikita.
Let’s look at another sentence which contains a restrictive relative clause.
The man who is sitting next to Elena is Brad Pitt’s younger,
more handsome brother.
The restrictive relative clause IDENTIFIES or points out which man
(out of perhaps many possibilities) is Brad Pitt’s brother.
The information in the restrictive relative clause provides the
necessary information to identify Brad Pitt’s brother. In other words,
without this information, we would not know who the man is.
Practice
Look at the picture below.
Then, create sentences which use restrictive relative clauses
to identify the following:
1. Elena’s secret husband
2. Nikita’s girlfriend
3. The California Chardonnay
4. The hostess of the party
5. The man sitting on the right
The general pronoun that may be substituted for the relative pronoun in restrictive relative clauses.
The following are examples in which the general pronoun that is substituted for the relative pronoun.
If the relative pronoun is not the subject of the relative clause, we do not need to use a relative pronoun (or that) at all.
The boy (who/m, that) we met is very clever. [boy is not the subject]
The boy is playing the piano is very clever. [WRONG]
Although there is some choice in placing a preposition which a
Wh-pronoun has as its complement, there is no such choice with
the general pronoun that.
Wh-
• The table which the boy crawled under…
• The table under which the boy crawled…
That
• The table that the boy crawled under…
• The table under that the boy crawled… [WRONG]
As you can see in the above examples, we must postpose, that is, place the preposition after the word that. The possible options are shown in the table below.
Note: Who is preferred to that when it is the subject and when it is personal, for example, People who visit me. That is preferred to (who/m) when it is an object, for example, People that I visit.
Case #1
Case #2
Case #3
Case #4
Case #5
Case #6
Case #7
Case #8